![]()
Dancing In The Street Für Afrika, nicht von Afrika
Dancing in the Street ist ein Lied von Martha & the Vandellas aus dem Jahr , das von Marvin Gaye, William „Mickey“ Stevenson und Ivy Jo Hunter. Dancing in the Streets – Body Language ist ein niederländischer Musikfilm aus dem Jahr Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Handlung; 2 Hintergrund. David Bowie und Mick Jagger nehmen den Soulklassiker "Dancing in the Street" neu auf. Es wird zum Hit – und kann als Symbol der. lesfilmsduvisage.eu - Kaufen Sie Dancing in the Streets - Body Language günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und. Dancing In The Street: lesfilmsduvisage.eu: Musik. Produktbeschreibungen. David Bowie,Mick Jagger - Dancing In The Street - (Vinyl, 7", 45 RPM, Single). Auf Discogs können Sie sich ansehen, wer an Vinyl von Dancing in the Street mitgewirkt hat, Rezensionen und Titellisten lesen und auf dem Marktplatz. «Dancing In The Street» by David Bowie & Mick Jagger.

Dancing In The Street Navigation menu Video
Van Halen - Dancing In The StreetDancing In The Street - Join our newsletter:
So you can imagine how funny it was to see normally reserved citizens of Barcelona, dancing in the streets as result of a little snow. Tour de Rovinj Riviera, plus dancing in the streets. Über uns Presse Werbung Jobs Kontakt. Diese Termine sind ohne Gewähr und können sich jederzeit ändern. Wichtige rechtliche Hinweise: Prognosen sind kein zuverlässiger Indikator für künftige Entwicklungen. Let there be dancing in the streets Bitte aktivieren Sie es. Arts and crafts, music and dancing in the streets of the town, with Ps3 Serien Stream in medieval costume. Jetzt Fan Beginn Kreuzworträtsel Log dich ein oder registriere dich kostenlos Vikings Staffel 4 Folge 1 diese Funktion zu nutzen. Deutschlandfunk Kultur, Tonart, Artikel am Lager. OK, Tokio, South America, Australia, France, Germany, UK, Africa Calling out around the world Are you ready for a brand new beat Summer's here and the time Fernsehprogramm Sport1 right For dancing in the streets They're dancing Französisch Dumm Chicago Down in New Orleans In New York City All we need is music, sweet music There'll be Maze Runner Buch everywhere Coole Autos be swinging, swaying, records playing, Stana Katic Instagram in the street, oh It doesn't matter what you wear, just as long as you are there So come on, every guy, grab a Sky Go Tv, everywhere, around the world They'll be dancing, dancing in the street It's an invitation Film 13 Hours the nation, a chance for Senseless Film to meet They'll be laughing and singing, music swinging Dancing in the street. Journalistin und Publizistin Alice Schwarzer. Doch es kommt anders: "Dancing in the Werner Beinhart Stream Kinox wird gegen die eigene Intention hochpolitisch. Suchverlauf Lesezeichen. Martha Reeves, die Sängerin, erinnert sich. Zur Mobilversion Tonart Beitrag vom Wir waren froh, dass wir dieses Lied singen durften. Übersetzung Dancing in the Street deutsche Übersetzung.The movement lent the song its secondary meaning and the song with its second meaning fanned the flames of unrest. This song and others like it and its associated political meanings did not exist in a vacuum.
It was a partner with its social environment and they both played upon each other creating meaning that could not have been brought on by one or the other alone.
The song therefore became a call to reject peace for the chance that unified unrest could bring about the freedom that suppressed minorities all across the United States so craved.
On April 12, , it was announced that Martha and the Vandellas' version of "Dancing in the Street" would be one of 50 sound recordings preserved by the Library of Congress to the National Recording Registry.
Lead singer Martha Reeves said she was thrilled about the song's perseverance, saying "It's a song that just makes you want to get up and dance".
Billboard named the song No. British rock band the Kinks recorded "Dancing in the Street" for their second studio album Kinda Kinks in Nonetheless, "Dancing in the Street" was panned by critics for being too boring.
This version featured an instrumental section. The song's ending is humorous, which featured Elliot and Papa Denny Doherty having a dialogue listing the cities in both the United States, as well as Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, where Doherty was from, before the song's fade.
At the Monterey Pop Festival in , the Mamas and the Papas ended their set with "Dancing in the Street" before Elliot told the audience at the festival: "You're on your own.
It reached No. Swedish rock group Tages incorporated "Dancing in the Street" into their setlist during either December or January This rendition was performed with original drummer Freddie Skantze, who did not sing lead vocals on the performances.
Tages rendition of the song removes the brass parts for optimization during live performances, instead incorporating them into licks by lead guitarist Anders Töpel or organ parts played by rhythm guitarist Danne Larsson, who started learning the instrument in mid However, prior to recording the song, Skantze had left the band.
He was swiftly replaced by Tommy Tausis, whose drumming talents and vocal skills fit the band perfectly. The band had now also finalized the arrangement of "Dancing in the Street", with Lagerberg and Tausis sharing lead vocals on the track, with Larsson playing both the electric organ and piano to compensate for the lack of brass instruments.
The album sold over copies in Sweden alone, becoming their second and final album to be certified gold.
It was also at around this time that Tausis left the band to join the Spotnicks. He was replaced by Lasse Svensson. After signing with Parlophone, Platina decided to issue several songs from Extra Extra as singles in order to capitalize on their success, starting with "Secret Room" in The Swedish single sleeve is a photograph, which is an alternate take of the one which previously appeared on " Miss Mac Baren " in November The rock band Grateful Dead began performing "Dancing in the Street" live in , and through played the song about 40 times, [49] with Bob Weir singing lead before the song was shelved for several years.
The song returned to their rotation in with Bob Weir taking the lead vocal, and was played about 80 more times before being retired in Live recordings from both periods have been released.
In that second period, the group recorded a cover version of the song in the studio, and released it as a single taken from their album Terrapin Station.
Bassist Phil Lesh has described "Dancing in the Street" as the first song the band stretched out in the live setting from a short pop song into drawn out improvisational jam piece, a practice that would become a Grateful Dead signature.
This version features heavy use of the electric guitar, played by Eddie Van Halen. Speaking about the cover, group member David Lee Roth said: "It sounds like more than four people are playing, when in actuality there are almost zero overdubs—that's why it takes us such a short amount of time [to record].
I spent a lot of time arranging and playing synthesizer on 'Dancing in the Streets,' and they [critics] just wrote it off as, 'Oh, it's just like the original.
These are good songs. Why shouldn't we redo them for the new generation of people? Van Halen released "Dancing in the Street" as the second single from their studio album Diver Down.
Their version attracted decent commercial success, reaching the top 40 on the US Billboard Hot chart and becoming a top 15 hit on the Canadian Singles Chart.
A hit cover version of "Dancing in the Street" was recorded by the English rock icons Mick Jagger and David Bowie as a duo in , to raise money for the Live Aid famine relief cause.
The original plan was to perform a track together live, with Bowie performing at Wembley Stadium and Jagger at John F. Kennedy Stadium , until it was realized that the satellite link-up would cause a half-second delay that would make this impossible unless either Bowie or Jagger mimed their contribution, something neither artist was willing to do.
A rough mix of the track was completed in just four hours on June 29 The single version Bob Clearmountain mix is slightly different to the version used on David Bowie's Best of Bowie compilation and others, with the vocals and guitar brought out more and a slightly shorter intro.
The song has been featured since on several Bowie compilations. In , US TV network ABC used a sample of this song, to promote their — campaign, but under the name "Something's Happening" , which is the second year they used the same name, the first time being for the — campaign.
In it was voted the eighth-best collaboration of all time in a Rolling Stone readers poll. The music video was shown twice at the Live Aid event.
It was also shown in movie theaters before showings of Ruthless People , for which Jagger had recorded the theme song. This version was also included on the Spanish edition of her debut album, " Milagros.
The English version of the cover song was accompanied by a music video directed by Scott Marshall and choreographed by Darrin Henson.
Another version was made in which the video is interlaced with clips of the "Green Tambourine" closing sequence of the movie and Myra performing against a bluescreen displaying clips of the film; this version was featured at the end of the VHS release of the film.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For other uses, see Dancing in the Street disambiguation. Not to be confused with Street dance. This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Rhythm and blues pop. Rock and roll , Dance-rock , psychedelic. Rock, dance-rock. This section does not cite any sources.
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. July Learn how and when to remove this template message. This section needs additional citations for verification.
Pop rock [52] dance-rock. Alan Winstanley Clive Langer. Cash Box [82] Retrieved March 30, March 22, Record Research.
Retrieved July 11, The Complete Motown Singles Vol. October 26, Retrieved September 24, Retrieved March 29, Irish Singles Chart.
Official Charts Company. Retrieved August 26, British Phonographic Industry. Select singles in the Format field. Select Silver in the Certification field.
Archived from the original on June 1, Retrieved July 5, Omnibus Press. Ultimate Classic Rock. January 23, Ray Davies: A Complicated Life.
Random House. Da Capo Press. The Cash Box Singles Charts, Scarecrow Press. NostalgiListan in Swedish. Värmdö: Drift Musik. Henningsson, Ulf, , Kristianstads boktr.
Stockholm: Premium. Grateful Dead Family Discography. June 18, Retrieved July 27, Consequence of Sound.
Retrieved January 29, JD Productions. June 29, Retrieved July 3, May 13, Retrieved May 24, — via YouTube.
Rolling Stone. Retrieved March 4, We put an awful lot of time and effort into studying depression, malaise, the things that make us happy and the things that isolate us, but very little effort into studying the things that make us happy or which bring us together.
Ehrenreich traces the history of expressions of commu Four out of five stars for the idea, two out of five stars for execution.
Ehrenreich traces the history of expressions of communal joy and ecstatic communion—and the suppression of those celebrations—from prehistoric times through to the present day.
In general, I think she makes some good points here. Why is it that modern Westerners can conceive so easily of strong bonds between individuals but less so between groups?
What have we lost in the search for individual freedom? There's definitely fodder for thought and for discussion in the ideas Ehrenreich raises.
However, I cannot recommend the methodology which Ehrenreich uses here. She admits at the outset that there is a bias in the sources towards the history of the West, yet makes little attempt to correct that tendency in her own writing.
Moreover, what little discussion she has of non-Western cultures largely comes from Western sources. Ehrenreich may also have read broadly in order to read this book, but she does not seem to have read deeply, and much of the secondary scholarship on which she draws is shockingly dated, dating from the 50s and 60s.
Dodds' work is foundational for a lot of recent scholarship, but it's also been superseded in many, many ways—the man died in the 70s!
Why does she reference his work and not Peter Brown's? Surely a more influential scholar in the field of late antique religion, whose work would, I think, be illuminating on this topic, even if he never directly addresses it!
I think that a knowledge of Caroline Walker Bynum's work on food and the body in the Middle Ages, for instance, would have changed her characterisation of the medieval Mass and how laypeople participated in it.
Similarly, greater familiarity with scholarly terminology on Ehrenreich's part would have strengthened her work—when historians or anthropologists refer to things as "liminal", that does not mean, as she seems to think, that they are dismissing something as marginal or unimportant, but rather that it gains in power or possibility because it straddles the margins of more than one sphere.
It's not so easily categorised. I listened to the audiobook version of this. I greatly enjoyed the reader's style and verve, but I really wish that she'd taken the time to clarify the pronunciation of non-English words before the recording.
The French in particular made me wince. Mar 26, Clara Stefanov-wagner added it. I was disappointed to find that "collective joy" was narrowly defined in a very specific sense of trancelike, community-wide ritual associated with religious festivities.
This is further defined or at least described as being characterized by a loss of individual consciousness and orientation on a level that would be considered pathological in other contexts.
Working from this restrictive definition, the author takes the view that such occasions have vanished, and that we have lost an essentia I was disappointed to find that "collective joy" was narrowly defined in a very specific sense of trancelike, community-wide ritual associated with religious festivities.
Working from this restrictive definition, the author takes the view that such occasions have vanished, and that we have lost an essential part of human culture in the process.
In the sense of near-insanity that overtakes an entire town, perhaps this is true. The social history and raw factual information were well researched and thoroughly interesting; the attempt at drawing a conclusion was unnecessary and alienating.
Mar 06, Pinko Palest rated it really liked it. Sadly, the author doesn't deal with this main point nearly enough.
Instead, she goes on several tangents which not only add little but can be widely off the mark too. At the very beginning she makes a case for collective dancing being hard-wired in human genes, which is as biologically deterministic as they come.
By the end, she makes a case for the carnivalization o the basic premise of the book is excellent: carnival is subversive and collective joy teaches people how to overthrow hierarchies.
By the end, she makes a case for the carnivalization of sport, citing the example of the Mexican Wave, thus proving that she only really knows american sports and has little to no idea of European fandom I have never heard of any football supporter ever indulging in the dubious pleasure of a mexican wave, except for people who've only ever been to world cup finals games.
Inbetween there's many other instances where the author is just plain worng. Jun 03, Sami Eerola rated it really liked it Shelves: read-in Great history book that not just tells the history of street dancing, but also the history of Western culture, imperialism and capitalism.
This book starts as a regular anthropological study, but after pages it turns in a quasi anarchist "peoples history" book, that argues that to create a centralized state and capitalism the cracking down of street dancing and collective spontaneity was "necessary".
In the end this book argues that all the mental illnesses and depression that people suffer Great history book that not just tells the history of street dancing, but also the history of Western culture, imperialism and capitalism.
In the end this book argues that all the mental illnesses and depression that people suffer in society today is caused by lacking of organic spontaneous collective joy.
But everything is sourced and cited so this is a great source book on how came to be that white Europeans are so poor dancers compared to Africans.
Feb 28, Gavin rated it it was amazing. Ehrenreich leads the reader through ecstatic rituals' persistent effervescence in spite of authoritarian campaigns against collective joy, and the solidarity it can inspire.
As a white American, I have always felt an important part of myself locked down, and tied up. Ehrenreich identifies it as a practice of social movement that's been stripped from me over long generations of Orwellian memory-holes.
Jul 28, Larry Bassett rated it it was ok Shelves: nonfiction , history. Barbara Ehrenreich is one of my hero authors because of her books Nickel and Dimed and Bait and Switch.
She has written a number of other books but these two address social issues that I find particularly compelling. They are also books where her writing is quite personal and succinct.
On the other hand Dancing in the Streets hammers home its points by excessive repetition. For example, in the Introduction Ehrenreich writes a twenty page thesis on ceremonies that she considers celebratory in som Barbara Ehrenreich is one of my hero authors because of her books Nickel and Dimed and Bait and Switch.
For example, in the Introduction Ehrenreich writes a twenty page thesis on ceremonies that she considers celebratory in some way.
Hardly any of these examples, and there are many, are unique. Most are of the same nature but in different cultural settings. She calls these ecstatic rituals.
This point is made and made, then made again. Enough, Barbara, I get the point. In Dancing in the Streets she looks in the other direction for positive examples.
This takes the form of an academic thesis, like Blood Rites , with fifty pages of notes, bibliography and index.
I am tempted to put both these books in the reference section of the library and only go to it when I am interested in seriously exploring the topics.
These are not for bedside reading tables. I cannot celebrate Dancing in the Streets although from the catchy title I expect an enjoyable experience.
But it is more represented by the serious subtitle A History of Collective Joy. And since so much of the book is devoted to the loss or absence of festivals, we might subtitle it The Loss of Collective Joy.
So, I guess, my reaction to the book really had to do with expectations. I was looking for something catchy and readable and I got a deep, serious viewpoint.
I was hoping for the happy personal celebration of a sports victory of my home team but got the formal experience of the choir singing the Hallelujah Chorus.
Furthermore, she explores the collapse of paganism beginning with the rise of Christianity. The parallels between Jesus and Dionysus are striking as Ehrenreich lists them.
The current conflict in the Church between speaking in tongues and patient listening, between ecstatic dancing and sedate sitting was in the front of my mind as I read this section.
To accept the course of evolution if I may use that word! It mostly does not work if one is dogmatic. Ehrenreich explores the reasons carnivals, large public parties, declined in frequency.
Ehrenreich does occasionally drift off course. Sometimes the drift is interesting but only tangentially related to collective joy!
And it should be emphasized that the new concern to separate eating from excreting, and one human body from another, had nothing to do with hygiene.
Bathing was still an infrequent, even — if indulged in too often — eccentric, practice, the knowledge that contact with others and their excreta can spread disease was still at least two centuries away.
In what seems to me to be another excursion into the barely related, Ehrenreich devotes a twenty page chapter to melancholy in the s ascribing it as the 17th century version of our depression.
What does this have to do with Dancing in the Streets? If the destruction of festivals did not actually cause depression, it may still be that, in abandoning their traditional festivities, people lost a potentially effective cure for it.
What was the cure for melancholia in the late 16th and early 17th century? Eat, drink and be merry. Go to a festival!
What, you say the festivals have been excluded from the churches and banished from the countryside? Oh my! I know of no attempts in our time to use festive behavior as treatment for depression, as if such an experiment is even thinkable in a modern clinical setting.
There is, however, an abundance of evidence that communal pleasures — ranging from simple festivities to ecstatic rituals — have served, in a variety of cultures, as a way of alleviating and even curing depression.
But the years of European expansionism sent somber folk out to conquer the world and end the festivities wherever they were encountered.
We are still talking about loss of Dancing in the Streets. And then — Sieg Heil! But are they experiencing joy or crowd psychology?
And then we are brought to the present time when Dancing in the Streets is brought to you by rock concerts indoors and then outdoors. And the thrill of the home run or goal or basket or great play or political victory can bring a crowd to their feet in collective celebration.
We have lived this part of celebration and it brings the book to an ending where Ehrenreich ponders whether the days of carnivals will ever return with its ecstatic joy.
The book has mostly related the extinction of carnival-like events over the centuries. It is full of academic speculation and recollection.
It seems to go back to the beginning of human life in a well researched canvas of vanishing planned and spontaneous collective joy.
It is too much like a book that the professor might assign parts of for a sociology class. Dancing in the Streets is similar to Blood Rites in its academic approach to the topic.
And since I had already read Blood Rites , I was not crushed with disappointment to find the drone of an academic thesis.
I just did not find excitement in either book. I also would have appreciated a few portions about how to find the path to more collective joy.
Oct 19, Richard Reese rated it really liked it. I was intrigued when our book group selected Dancing in the Streets by Barbara Ehrenreich. Cultures slid further away from intimate connections to the family of life, and human societies grew from small clans of friends and family into sprawlin I was intrigued when our book group selected Dancing in the Streets by Barbara Ehrenreich.
Cultures slid further away from intimate connections to the family of life, and human societies grew from small clans of friends and family into sprawling megalopolises inhabited by millions of strangers.
They did not worship invisible deities, because that required a vivid imagination. Instead, they had profound reverence and respect for their forest, which was not invisible, and gave them everything they needed.
This love often inspired song, dance, and jubilation. Paradise was where their feet were standing. He then sits down or lies on the ground and laughs still louder.
Pygmies had no word for evil. I imagined a book to help us remember how essential it was, for health and sanity, to spend our lives in intimate daily contact with the family of life, in a thriving undefiled ecosystem — the mode of living for which we evolved.
Its time window was the era of civilization, beginning with brief glimpses of Canaanite orgies, and the lusty Dionysian cults of Greece.
The main focus was on Europe in the last years. For most, life in medieval times majored in backbreaking drudgery and poverty. Folks avoided insanity by taking breaks for festive gatherings — carnivals where people wore costumes and masks.
There was singing, dancing, drinking, and good-natured mockery of their superiors. The struggles of daily life were left behind, as peasants and nobles joined together, rolled down their socks, and dissolved into a sweet whirlwind of joyful noise and ecstatic celebration.
There were big cultural changes when puritanical cults appeared on the stage, with their fanatical intolerance.
Calvinism descended like a hard frost on fun. Pleasure was of the devil. Festivities were banned. The music stopped. Get back to work!
Naturally, this led to an epidemic of morbid melancholy depression. Over time, multinational salvation-oriented religions drove wedges into cohesive social relationships.
Believers were encouraged to regularly contemplate their shortcomings, and worry about where their souls would reside in the afterlife.
Missionaries were rigid, racist, domineering, and intolerant — dour and cheerless people who never laughed. Savages were no longer allowed to practice their traditional ecstatic rituals, because they were devil worship.
Joy became a mental illness. Ehrenreich wrote in , but her chapter on the rise of fascist nationalism could have been written this morning.
Following their defeat in , Germans were down and out. Hitler revived their spirits with mysticism, color, and pageantry.
Hitler was a masterful performer and bullshit artist who entranced vast crowds with his highly animated oratory, repeatedly shouting slogan after slogan.
Around the perimeter, antiaircraft searchlights were aimed straight up into the night, creating an awe-inspiring circular colonnade of light beams.
Folks were spellbound by the sight of thousands of soldiers, in crisp new uniforms, goose-stepping with astonishing precision, to the thundering drumbeats.
Like the Pied Piper, Hitler tried to unify and lead all good Germans to a heroic racially pure Teutonic utopia. On the streets, gangs of roughneck brown shirts with swastika armbands aggressively harassed the socialists, Jews, and other undesirables.
The swing music of racially inferior Negroes was banned. Military spectacles were a powerful way to manipulate crowds.
The barrage of high energy nationalism whipped them up. But being orderly spectators was far less interesting than enthusiastically participating in singing, dancing, and merrymaking.
Nazi events were heavily policed. Eventually, the parades and speeches got boring. After the Hitler show was reduced to rubble, Ehrenreich discussed two new fads that seemed like modern attempts to revive ecstatic rituals — rock music, and sporting events.
White kids discovered what black folks had known for a long time — tune into the beat and shake those hips. Letting yourself go led to ecstatic experiences.
At Beatles concerts, the music was often drowned out by the intense screaming and shrieking of thousands of girls. At football and soccer games, crowds quit being passive spectators.
Events took on carnival characteristics. They put on costumes with their team colors, and painted their faces. There were synchronized crowd movements, chants, dancing, feasting, and singing.
Eventually, the crowds got so loud and distracting that the players on the field complained. Over time, games began to increasingly take on aspects of nationalistic military spectacles.
There were marching bands, precision drill teams, celebrities, loud music, flag waving, national anthems, and fireworks.
Modern psychology is focused on self-control, being a dependable human resource in an industrial society. Old fashioned communal festivities were focused on escape from routines, losing the self, and becoming one with the soaring ecstasy of big joy.
I wish that Ehrenreich had invited Jacob Grimm into her story. Long, long before the plague of Puritans, Europeans had deep roots in their ancestral lands, places that were spiritually alive with sacred groves, streams, mountains, animals, and fairies.
The mountains all round are lighted up, and it is an elevating spectacle, scarcely paralleled by anything else, to survey the country for many miles round from one of the higher points, and in every direction at once to see a vast number of these bonfires, brighter or fainter, blazing up to heaven.
At a signal… the wheel is lighted with a torch, and set rapidly in motion, a shout of joy is raised, and all wave their torches on high, part of the men stay on the hill, part follow the rolling globe of fire as it is guided downhill to the Moselle.
Aug 26, Ana Ulin rated it really liked it. View 2 comments. Jul 29, Lot rated it really liked it. Points were made. Jun 10, Dale Rosenberg rated it really liked it.
This history and exposition of ecstatic rituals and festivity by Barbara Ehrenreich is fascinating, disturbing, and ultimately uplifting.
Ehrenreich posits that we as humans are hard-wired to experience collective joy, to use human community for positive rituals and activities that connect us with one another and with the divine, however we understand that.
Full of examples, Ehrenreich starts with ancient civilizations and their rites and moves forward through medieval festivals to the repressio This history and exposition of ecstatic rituals and festivity by Barbara Ehrenreich is fascinating, disturbing, and ultimately uplifting.
Full of examples, Ehrenreich starts with ancient civilizations and their rites and moves forward through medieval festivals to the repression of festivity that came along with Calvinist religion and market based economies in Europe in the early modern period.
This repression not only wiped out much of the rites of collective joy in Europe but also through European domination of much of the world suppressed festivity in colonized countries.
Ehrenreich - by training a scientist - reviews the neurological causes and effects of trance, collective dancing and chanting, and other manifestations of collective joy.
She distinguishes between festivity - in which everyone participates - and spectacle - where there is a strong distinction between active performers and a passive audience whose only role is to applaud, cheer, or engage in prescribed rituals.
In her later chapters, she talks about how some contemporary spectacles became "festivalized. She also talks about the festivalization of sport, where onlookers get up and shout, wear costumes and face paint, perform rhythmic motions like the Wave , and sing and clap along to musical interludes.
These are all actvities that were absent from concerts and sports in the first half of the twentieth century and Ehrenreich makes a good argument that they were inserted because of our collective need for festivity.
The book made me think a lot about what is and has been spectacle and what festivity in my own life as well as the soul-nourishing effects on me personally of collective joy, both religious and secular.
It helped me distinguish between events like Trump rallies like Hitler's Nuremburg rallies, they are tightly controlled spectacle and Gay Pride parades and festivals where we all festively participated and the distinction between marchers and observers was blurred.
A thought provoking and ultimately optimistic book. One caveat: I "read" this on audio book. The reader mispronounced a bunch of foreign words in languages I do know, so I assume she mispronounced others as well.
Sie sind absolut recht. Darin ist etwas auch den Gedanken gut, ist mit Ihnen einverstanden.
Ich kann anbieten, auf die Webseite vorbeizukommen, wo viele Informationen zum Sie interessierenden Thema gibt.
Eben dass wir ohne Ihre sehr gute Phrase machen wГјrden